Menu
Microsoft strongly encourages users to switch to a different browser than Internet Explorer as it no longer meets modern web and security standards. Therefore we cannot guarantee that our site fully works in Internet Explorer. You can use Chrome or Firefox instead.

Better Dividend Aristocrat: Johnson & Johnson or Medtronic?


Published by Bob Ciura on July 13th, 2017

For investors looking for high-quality dividend stocks, the Dividend Aristocrats is a great place to begin your research.

The Dividend Aristocrats Excel spreadsheet has 51 stocks with 25+ consecutive years of dividend increases.

Health care giants Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Medtronic (MDT) are both on the list.

J&J is a member of an even more exclusive club: the Dividend Kings.

It has increased its dividend for 55 years in a row, compared with 40 years for Medtronic.

The Dividend Kings Excel spreadsheet has just 19 stocks, each with 50+ years of consecutive dividend increases.

This article will attempt to find out which of these two Dividend Aristocrats is the better buy right now.

Business Overview

Winner: J&J

Both J&J and Medtronic are highly profitable companies, with leadership positions in their respective industries.

Medtronic is a global medical devices giant.

MDT Medtronic

Source: 2017 Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, page 4

There is some overlap between them. J&J also has a large medical devices business of its own.

The main difference between the two companies, is that J&J is much more diversified.

In addition to its medical devices segment, it also operates huge pharmaceuticals and consumer healthcare businesses.

JNJ Overview

Source: 2016 Earnings Presentation, page 1

This gives J&J a structural advantage, which may be more attractive to investors looking for steadier growth. J&J’s diversification gives it more consistent growth.

Medtronic performed well in fiscal 2017, with 5% organic revneue growth for the full fiscal year. Adjusted earnings-per-share increased 11%, to $4.60.

All four of Medtronic’s businesses generated growth, led by 4% organic growth in the Minimally Invasive Therapies Group and Diabetes Group.

Last year’s performance was highly impressive, although in fiscal 2016, Medtronic’s adjusted earnings-per-share increased just 2%.

J&J did not quite match Medtronic in its most recent full fiscal year, although it performed very well itself.

In 2016, J&J’s adjusted earnings-per-share increased 9%, to $6.73.

Pharmaceuticals were its best segment last year, with operational sales growth of 12%, followed by medical devices and consumer growth of 4% each.

Over the past five full fiscal years, J&J increased diluted earnings-per-share by 9% compounded annually. Medtronic’s GAAP earnings-per-share declined by 14% over the past five years, due to significant restructuring and amortization charges.

As a result, Medtronic’s earnings have been much more volatile over the past several years. J&J has a large consumer franchise, which gives it more consistent results from year to year.

J&J’s consumer business is loaded with popular household brands, such as Johnson’s, Tylenol, Neutrogena, Listerine, and Band-Aid.

JNJ Brands

Source: 2017 CAGNY Presentation, page 7

J&J has three individual consumer brands—Johnson’s, Neutrogena, and Listerine—that each generate $1 billion or more in annual sales.

This helps the company be more resistant to recessions, than it would be if it operated in a single product market.

Separately, J&J enjoys unrivaled financial strength.

It is one of just two U.S. companies with the AAA credit rating from Standard & Poor’s. Medtronic has an A rating, which is strong, but several notches below J&J.

Consider that, according to S&P, J&J has a higher credit rating than the U.S. government. This provides it with a tremendous advantage.

Possessing the highest possible credit rating allows J&J to raise capital at very attractive rates, which it can use to pursue acquisitions, or invest in research and development.

This also gives J&J an edge, when it comes to future growth potential.

Growth Prospects

Winner: J&J

While J&J’s consumer business provide it with great stability, its future growth engine is pharmaceuticals.

This is another advantage J&J has over Medtronic, which does not operate in pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutical revenue rose at a double-digit pace for J&J last year.

Revenue growth is poised to continue going forward, thanks to the company’s strong drug pipeline, and its $30 billion acquisition of Actelion.

JNJ Actelion

Source: Acquisition Presentation, page 11

Actelion is a stand-alone R&D company, which specializes in pulmonary arterial hypertension. This widens J&J’s pharmaceutical exposure, into a focus area of significant unmet need.

J&J expects Actelion will add at least 1% to the company’s overall revenue growth each year. Earnings growth should be at least a point above this, thanks to expected cost synergies.

This makes the Actelion acquisition very accretive to shareholders.

Plus, J&J has an excellent organic pipeline. Its two most attractive areas are oncology and immunology, which generated revenue growth of 24% and 15%, respectively, in 2016.

Medtronic is no stranger to transformational acquisitions. In 2015, Medtronic acquired Covidien in a massive $43 billion deal.

MDT Covidien

Source: 2017 Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, page 20

The acquisition significantly added to Medtronic’s product line.

And, Medtronic has reaped significant cost synergies from the takeover, including $600 million in savings in fiscal 2017.

However, the cost savings are projected to wind down in 2017, to $250 million-$275 million this year.

Still, J&J is expected to generate stronger growth up ahead.

On average, analysts expect J&J to increase earnings-per-share by 9% in 2017, and 12% in 2018. For its part, Medtronic is projected to grow earnings-per-share by just 5% in 2017, and 3% next year.

Dividend Analysis

Winner: Toss Up

When it comes to dividends, J&J and Medtronic are both appealing, for different reasons.

J&J is a stronger dividend stock for retirees, or those interested in current income. It has a current dividend yield of 2.6%, roughly 50 basis points above Medtronic’s yield.

Medtronic has a 2.1% dividend yield, which is just on-par with the S&P 500 Index average yield.

As a result, Medtronic may be less attractive for investors who want income right now. That said, it is a stronger choice for dividend growth investors, because of its high dividend growth rates.

From fiscal 1978-fiscal 2017, Medtronic grew its dividend by 18% per year, on average.

MDT Dividend

Source: 2017 Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, page 24

Over the past 10 years, J&J has increased its dividend by 7% per year, on average.

Medtronic’s most recent dividend increase was 7%, which was below its average growth rate, although it still beats J&J’s most recent dividend raise, which was 5%.

Final Thoughts

There is little doubt that both Medtronic and J&J are high-quality businesses. Investors will likely do well with either stock.

That said, J&J may be the better Dividend Aristocrat to own. It has a higher dividend yield, a more diversified business model, and a stronger growth catalyst in its pharmaceutical business.

For investors considering one or the other, J&J gets the nod.


Source: suredividend


Comments