Worm Capital 2021 Annual Letter: Optimism For 2022 And Beyond
![Worm Capital](https://www.valuewalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Worm-2-300x163.png)
Worm Capital’s annual letter for the year ended December 2021, titled, “Optimism For 2022 And Beyond.”
Q4 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more
Dear Partners,
We are entering the 10th year of our long-only strategy, and the fifth year of our long/short strategy. Some of you have been with us for this entire journey; others may have joined more recently. Regardless of when you’ve joined, we are in the very early days of this journey together, and we are exceedingly optimistic about 2022 and beyond.
Below, we offer some thoughts about the future we’re headed into, and why we think the remainder of this decade - the 2020s - could prove to be one of the best decades for stock pickers.
As we see it, the 2020s will be defined by industrial disruption, corporate dislocation, and some of the most profound technological shifts of the last two centuries. We are hurtling towards a cleaner, more efficient, more automated world—and only the fit organizations will survive.
These changes will bring risk and chaos - but also enormous opportunities.
Big picture: We think this decade could yield a handful of huge winners - but perhaps many more losers. It’s increasingly becoming a winner-take-all game in business. Concentration in the absolute top stocks in this environment is not only the key for wealth creation: it’s our best defense. New business models and new technologies are emerging, threatening the old guard. It’s a Cambrian environment.
All investing is a game of strategy, and to win this game, especially in this fast-changing environment, we need well-developed theory—along with a well-defined research process. Internally, this is what we focus on, asking questions like: What’s next? How to position for tomorrow? What to own? What to avoid? How to approach valuation? What are our opponents saying? These questions are of critical, even existential, importance. This is especially true as performance attribution becomes increasingly consolidated in just a handful of names.
In the S&P 500 this year, just five stocks accounted for about one-third of the index’s 27% return, according to Goldman Sachs[1]. This trend is compounding off of an existing dynamic: A handful of winners drive returns. The researcher Henrik Bessembinder has found, for instance, that “just 86 stocks have accounted for $16 trillion in wealth creation, half of the stock market total, over the past 90 years.”[2]
Could this dynamic continue? In our view - yes, absolutely. In fact, over the next couple of decades, we think this dynamic could actually become even more extreme. Looking out over the next 20 years, we think there’s a good chance there may be a small number of enormously successful mega-stocks driving the indices - driven by power laws, scale, and network effects.
On the flipside, the death rate among companies within the S&P 500 is accelerating. In 1958, the average life-span of a company listed in the S&P 500 was 61 years. Today, it’s under 18 years.[3]
In our view, Wall Street analysis tends to place too much emphasis on looking backwards - especially in industries where the future looks fundamentally different than the past. Using shortcuts like P/E multiples makes sense in steady-state industries; the same can’t be said for industries undergoing rapid change, where value tends to appear more clearly in the future.
In this environment, our investment analysis is driven by a focus on the customer-level value proposition. In the game of business, we ask: Who is winning on the ground level? What are customers saying? Which organizations have customers lined up around the block? How big is the market? In a rip-and-replace economy, in industrial paradigm shifts, it’s the organizations that build the best value propositions for customers today that stand a chance to reap the financial rewards tomorrow.
These types of businesses are exceedingly rare, and their managers rarely prioritize short-term earnings. On their surface, these organizations often look “expensive” to traditional value investors. But in our view, they require discounting cash flows relatively far into the future. They also require the incorporation of compounding non-linear growth. As these numbers can get quite big, their validity is often dismissed by many investors. This provides tremendous opportunity for those bold enough to do accurate forecasting of potentially explosive growth.
Looking forward, this is where we will continue to search for value: The land-grabbers. The territory-seizers. The management teams who can look five years out and ask, “What are we doing today to create a better value proposition in the future?” The leaders who can inspire and motivate their employees—and ultimately execute their vision.
This past year certainly had its challenges, but we increasingly like the setup heading into 2022.
At the end of 2020 and early 2021, there was a considerable amount of froth in certain pockets of the market that appeared to drive up asset prices across the board, almost indiscriminately. That froth needed to be flushed out, and over the past year, prices across pockets of the equity markets consolidated and normalized. In our experience, this sort of consolidation is actually quite good: It bodes well for the next leg up, but only for the deserving stocks - of which, we’d argue, there are only very few.
This is why we think 2022 and the years beyond could be a stock picker’s market - compared to the last couple of years, we could see a significant dispersion in the relative performance of specific companies.
Clearly, our style of investing - deep research, concentration in our best ideas - will not yield linear or “smooth” returns. As we’ve often counseled, this lumpiness is a feature, not a bug, of our process. To attempt to deliver outperformance over a multi-year time frame, we must - must - be positioned in only our best ideas. Concentration in a hyper-elite selection of flourishing business models is risk management. However, concentration leads to volatility - but this oscillation is perfectly healthy.
Over the last year, we’ve gained more conviction in the businesses that we own, based on their execution, improving fundamentals, margin expansion, and velocity of innovation. On several occasions throughout the year, we’ve raised our internal price targets on our portfolio companies, even as their stock prices stayed flat (or even declined).
Historically, this sort of fundamental business growth paired with a lagging stock price sets us up for what we call the “rubber band” effect, where a stock will snap back to the upside (sometimes in a hurry) when weak hands are flushed out, and the market re-rates the company back to a higher multiple.
As some of you may recall, this dynamic has happened multiple times throughout our strategy’s inception. For example, Amazon’s share price declined precipitously in 2014, at one point being down over 28%. In 2019, Tesla went through a similar phase. Occasionally, we choose to lean into these scenarios to help maximize the potential rewards of our conviction and research process.
Specifically, in these situations - i.e., when we gain conviction in a company while the stock price lags or declines for non-fundamental reasons - we can occasionally find attractive risk/reward opportunities in LEAPS. This year was no exception, and we continue to own a fair amount of these option contracts in the long/short strategy, which could offer a leveraged return for the Partnership throughout 2022 and 2023 if and when prices bounce back.
In Q4, we did not make any material changes to the portfolio. We are going full steam ahead. We foresee a few significant catalysts heading into the new year that could reset expectations - and surprise to the upside. As always, we appreciate your patience and resilience - it’s your trust that gives us the ability to let our investment theses play out.
We believe we’re in the very early innings here, and our firm’s partners are committed and invested right alongside you.
Our core positions continue to be focused on the disruption of transportation, renewable energy, e-commerce, automation/AI, and entertainment. Our view of the opportunity set is expanding: We are allocating research efforts on areas like AR/VR, healthcare innovation, and new technologies that could upend the traditional financial sector.
We are also growing our own organization to be well-positioned, from a research perspective, to be early in these shifts. This month, we are welcoming Cam Tierney, a research analyst, to the Worm Capital team. Cam is a recent graduate of Bentley University, and he will work with Eric Markowitz, Director of Research, on new areas of disruptive innovation.
Five years ago, we wrote about our general view that we were on the cusp of enormous industrial change and upheaval, which created a stock picker’s market. “You have to approach the market right now with a particular mantra in mind: Everything is up for grabs,” we wrote. “Repeat that to yourself if you must. Everything is up for grabs.[4]”
We want to double-down on this view. While stock quotes can and will diverge from reality in the short-term, over the long-run - over multiple years - prices will reflect value. Always.
And so all that matters, really, is getting into position - and finding value. As investors - as analysts - that’s where we stay focused. The businesses that we own are thriving, and, in several cases, innovating far faster than we could have anticipated at the launch of our strategy.
At a high level, we think we’re incredibly early on our journey. We’re excited and ready to meet the challenges ahead. As always, please get in touch if you have any questions, and we wish you a happy and healthy start to the new year.
Sincerely,
Worm Capital
Arne Alsin – Founder, CIO + Portfolio Manager
Zak Lash, CFA – COO
Daniel Crowley, CFA – Director of Portfolio Management
Eric Markowitz – Director of Research
Philip Bland – Director of Investor Relations
Emily Bullock – Head of Compliance
Cam Tierney – Research Analyst
[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/5-giant-stocks-are-driving-the-sp-500-to-records-goldman-144836651.html
[2] https://wpcarey.asu.edu/department-finance/faculty-research/do-stocks-outperform-treasury-bills
[3] https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/why-you-will-probably-live-longer-than-most-big-companies/
[4] https://www.wormcapital.com/the-wormhole-source/great-time-to-be-stock-picker
Updated on
Source valuewalk